Legal Opinion

Shew v. Hartnett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1922No. 16508PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is a personal injury action on behalf of Dorris Shew, by his guardian ad litem. On January 21, 1918, he, seventeen years of age, and as an employee of James J. Hartnett and wife, was operating a passenger elevator in an apartment house known as Haddon Hall apartments, in Seattle, when the hoisting cables of the elevator broke, causing the elevator to drop a distance of about thirty feet to the basement, causing the injuries complained of. A suit was commenced against the Hartnetts, lessees of the property, the Thomson Estate, Incorporated, owners of the property, and the J. J. Montgomery…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. George H. Gilbert Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Jaffe v. . HarteauNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Bowe v. HunkingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MangumTexas Supreme Court · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fraser v. KrugerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Barach v. Island Empire Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Moohr v. Victoria Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Churchwell v. Pure Oil Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Flannery v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API