Legal Opinion

Churchwell v. Pure Oil Pipe Line Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1926No. 438PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStanford, J.

Suit by appellant- and wife against appellee for the loss and damage to household goods, and for exposure and resultant sickness to appellant’s wife, by reason of a house in which appellants resided as tenants of appellee being inundated and washed away by an overflow of a nearby creek. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment rendered for appellee, defendant below. Appellants alleged, in substance, that appellant W. C. Churchwell was in the employ of appellee as a crude oil engineer, and that one of the considerations of his employment was that appellee was to furnish…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perez v. RabaudTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Dice's Administrator v. Zweigart's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Fraser v. KrugerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. C. R. Miller & Bro. v. NigroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Koch v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. BooherTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Morton v. Burton-Lingo Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. F. H. Vahlsing, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Quisenberry v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Burton-Lingo Co. v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API