Legal Opinion
Sibley v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 29, 2016No. Case No. 08-CV-2063-KHVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT REGARDING MOTION TO DECERTIFY
David R. Cohen, Special Master
This Court appointed the undersigned as Special Master and, among other things, requested “a recommended ruling on the pending motion to decertify the class.” Appointment Order at 5 (docket no. 532). For the reasons stated below, the Special Master now recommends the Court DENY Sprint’s renewed motion to decertify (docket no. 619).
I. General Background.
Defendants Sprint Nextel Corporation and Sprint/United Management Company (collectively, “Sprint”) are in the business of providing wireless telecommunications products and…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blair v. Transam Trucking, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Braver v. Northstar Alarm Services LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- McKenzie Law Firm, P.A. v. Ruby Receptionists, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020