Legal Opinion

State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1962No. 38,153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This case comes to us on appeal from an order denying a new trial and from judgments entered for defendants in proceedings in which the State of Minnesota and the Minnesota State Pharmaceutical Association, hereinafter referred to as the association, sought to enjoin the sale of certain prepackaged trade-name drugs and medicines by defendants who are not licensed under the provisions of Minn. St. c. 151. This case was originally before us in State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 253 Minn. 236, 92 N. W. (2d) 103. It is unnecessary to again state the involved setting in which the issues…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. State v. HovorkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Propper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Danny H. Webb v. Allstate Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  2. Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc. v. State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API