State v. Mojarro-Sandoval
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of reckless endangerment, ORS 163.195, and one count of driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010. His sole assignment of error is that the trial court should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal on the reckless endangerment charges. We affirm.
Because the state prevailed at trial, we state the facts in the light most favorable to the state and review those facts to determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found each of the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Cunningham,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McDonoughOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HarbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Waite v. DempseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MACIEL-CORTESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021