Legal Opinion

State v. MACIEL-CORTES

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 7, 2009No. 06C43403, A135949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of recklessly endangering another person. ORS 163.195. That statute provides that “[a] person commits the crime of recklessly endangering another person if the person recklessly engages in conduct which creates a substantial risk of serious physical injury to another person.” On appeal, defendant’s sole assignment of error is that the court impermissibly commented on the evidence in violation of ORCP 59 E when it instructed the jury that “[djriving under the influence of intoxicants is, itself, evidence that a person created a substantial risk…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Green v. LouderUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NaudainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. WiltseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. NewcomerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API