State v. MACIEL-CORTES
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of recklessly endangering another person. ORS 163.195. That statute provides that “[a] person commits the crime of recklessly endangering another person if the person recklessly engages in conduct which creates a substantial risk of serious physical injury to another person.” On appeal, defendant’s sole assignment of error is that the court impermissibly commented on the evidence in violation of ORCP 59 E when it instructed the jury that “[djriving under the influence of intoxicants is, itself, evidence that a person created a substantial risk…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Green v. LouderUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. NaudainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. WiltseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. NewcomerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.