Legal Opinion
Waverly Taylor, Inc. v. Polinger
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 1990No. 87-50, 87-359PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
This ease involves a protracted dispute which arose following a sale of development real property. The seller failed to seek the consent of the purchaser before applying for a special exception on adjacent property owned by the seller. The trial court found this failure to be a breach of the contract of sale. The cross-appeals before us challenge, inter alia, the correctness of this finding, the calculation of damages, and an award of attorney’s fees. We affirm the finding of breach of contract. We remand for a corrected award of damages and for further consideration…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass'n v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Dodek v. Cf 16 Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Pete v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare & Retirement Fund of 1950Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Perry v. SeraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Washington Convention Center Authority v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Capital City Mortgage Corp. v. Habana Village Art & Folklore, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.