Legal Opinion
Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 15, 2003No. 98-CV-960, 99-CV-231PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
The trial court found Virginia Impression Products Company, Inc. (“VIP”), in civil contempt of a 1982 consent decree that prohibited it from conducting business in the District of Columbia in the name of Federal Marketing Company. At the behest of the parties, the court referred the question of sanctions to two court-appointed co-special masters. Adopting their findings and recommendations, the court awarded $307,384.93 to Federal Marketing Company (“FMC”). Both parties appealed. 1
In summary, the main issues before us are (1) whether FMC is entitled to enforce the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Robert I. Powell v. Eugene M. ZuckertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Gull Airborne Instruments, Inc. v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense of the U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- JAIYEOLA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Washington Investment Partners of Delaware, LLC v. Securities HouseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Griffith v. BarnesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Kemp v. EilandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.