Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brunstetter Motor Co. v. Brunstetter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 11, 1934No. 24220Published

1DissentAndrews, J.

I dissent from the opinion in this ease.

The record herein shows that the claimant received an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, which was caused by burning paint coming in contact with his face, neck and eyes.

There appears to be no question of fact presented. The determination of the legal question presented requires a review of the history of the legislation and a determination of the effects of the legislative enactments applicable thereto.

Section 6, art. 2, ch. 246, Session Laws 1915, established a schedule of compensation to be payable for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fox v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Matter of Sweeting v. . American Knife Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Smith & McDannald v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. McAlester Colliery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Winona Oil Co. v. SmithsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API