Legal Opinion

West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 1992No. Nos. 340 and 353 C.D.1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

In this consolidated case, West Penn Power Company, Armco Advanced Materials Corporation, and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation1 appeal a decision of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. Mon Valley Energy Corporation has intervened in support of the commission’s decision.

History

In October 1987, Mon Valley entered into an electric energy purchase agreement (EEPA) with West Penn for energy to be produced at the Shannopin Mine Project, a proposed qualifying cogeneration facility (QF) under section 201 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), 16…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Public Utility Commission v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Miceli v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API