Legal Opinion

In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 11, 2014No. C 09-1967 CWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1133ORDER RESOLVING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND CLASS DEFINITION; DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Docket Nos. 898, 911, 933, 998)

CLAUDIA WILKEN, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs, a group of current and former college athletes, bring this antitrust class action against Defendant National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). They initially brought claims against Collegiate Licensing Company (CLC) and Electronic Arts Inc. (EA), as well, but agreed in September 2013 to settle those claims. Plaintiffs now move for summary judgment…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marshall v. ESPN Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API