Legal Opinion

Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. Pratt

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1941No. L. A. 16070Published

1Opinion of the Court

17 Cal.2d 85 (1941)

FEWEL & DAWES, INC. (a Corporation), Respondent,

v.

FRANKLIN L. PRATT, Appellant.

L. A. No. 16070.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

January 27, 1941.

Hugh Ward Lutz for Appellant.

Hulen C. Callaway and Joe Crail, Jr., for Respondent.

TRAYNOR, J.

The appellant, Franklin L. Pratt, a licensed life insurance broker, had written several policies of life insurance for John G. Bullock of Los Angeles. In 1928 Bullock decided to take out additional life insurance amounting to $150,000 under an arrangement that would enable his son-in- law, Richard W. Fewel, to receive half of the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API