Legal Opinion

United States v. Speqtrum, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 16, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-2111Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-2111 (JEB) SPEQTRUM, INC., d/b/a Speqtrum Health Care Services, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Government brought this action against Speqtrum, Inc., claiming that Defendant, a home-health-care provider, had knowingly submitted fraudulent claims to the District of Columbia’s Medicaid Program for services it had not rendered or was not authorized to render. The Government sought a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction under

18 U.S.C. § 1345

to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Thomas F. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. NB v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. United States v. SriramDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API