Musick, Peeler & Garrett v. Employers Ins. of Wausau
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
Where there is joint responsibility for tortious conduct, the question often arises whether those who compensate the injured party may seek contribution from other joint tortfeasors who have paid no damages or paid less than their fair share. In this case we must determine whether defendants in a suit based on an implied private right of action under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission (a 10b-5 action) may seek contribution from joint tortfeasors. Without addressing the merits of the claim for contribution in this case, we…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.