Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Healey

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 3, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Although the question here presented is nominally one of testamentary construction, the real issue concerns the validity and effect of a certain agreement executed on April 4, 1916. Shorn of superfluities, the question is, in essence, propounded as to whether a competent adult person who voluntarily enters into an agreement, untainted by fraud or undue influence, and receives and enjoys the material consideration provided therein for upwards of a score of years, may, at the end of that time, repudiate the agreement and be relieved of the obligations therein assumed by him without a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Petersen v. . Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. In re the Estate of CorliesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  5. In re MeekerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HilpertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of HartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  3. In re the Accounting of MarcyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API