Legal Opinion

Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Mobility

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 30, 2015No. 14-35393PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

We live in an age in which the intercon-nectivity of a wide range of modern technological products is vital. To achieve that interconnection, patent-holders often join together in compacts requiring licensing certain patents on reasonable and non discriminatory (“RAND”) terms. Such contracts are subject to the common-law obligations of good faith and fair' dealing.

At issue in this appeal are two patent portfolios, formerly owned by Appellants Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc., and General Instrument Corp., (“Motorola”), both of which are subject to RAND…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. FTC v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Mumid v. Abraham Lincoln High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. Saccameno v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Pro Done, Inc. v. Teresa Basham & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API