Legal Opinion
Tate v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided June 26, 2015No. 2140639PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Judge.
In December 2006, Michael C. Traffan-stedt entered into an agreement to settle a workers’ compensation claim against his employer, Dover Corporation d/b/a Heil Corporation (“Heil”) (“the 2006 settlement agreement”). The 2006 settlement agreement provided that future medical benefits would be left open. In 2011, Traffanstedt and Heil entered into a settlement agreement as to his future medical benefits (“the 2011 settlement agreement”), which was submitted to the trial court for approval, as required by Aia.Code 1975, § 25-5-56, a part of the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Lee v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Large v. Hayes by and Through NesbittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- B. Frank Joy Co. v. IsaacCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Rojo v. Loeper Landscaping, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Taylor v. Reliance Well Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017