Legal Opinion
Large v. Hayes by and Through Nesbitt
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 30, 1988No. 87-456, 87-457PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
The gist of this action is a claim that E. Ray Large and Jerry L. Thornton, as attorneys for Stephanie Hayes, a permanently brain damaged minor, breached their duty to Stephanie in the settlement of an underlying medical malpractice case, by collecting a 50% fee from monthly annuity payments in accordance with a settlement approved by the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama.1 In count I, Stephanie, through her guardian ad litem, sought to vacate the order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte St. Regis Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Cunningham v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Miller v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Maddox v. Druid City Hospital Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Tammy Burke, Royal Insurance Company, Linda Burke Daniels, Plaintiff-Third-Party v. John Smith, Heyl Truck Lines, Inc., Defendants-Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Maryland Cas. Co. v. TiffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Stone v. Gulf American Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Burlington Northern R. Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Stockton v. CKPD DEVELOPMENT CO., LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.