Legal Opinion

Lusby v. Baltimore Transit Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 14, 1950No. [No. 135, October Term, 1949.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.

The appellants, husband and wife, filed two separate suits against The Baltimore Transit Company for damages sustained as the result of a fall by the wife while alighting from a bus of the Company. The second amended narr was similar in both cases, and in both, demurrers were sustained without leave to amend, and judgments entered in favor of the defendant for costs of suit. From these judgments appeals were taken.

The allegations in the declaration in the wife’s case were as follows:

“For that the defendant, The Baltimore Transit Company, is a corporation owning and operating a street railway…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  2. Livingston v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  3. O'Neill Company v. CrummittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Jones v. Baton Rouge Electric Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Hanway v. B. O.R.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rehn v. Westfield AmericaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Maans v. Giant of Maryland, L.L.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Frazier v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. HairstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API