Legal Opinion

Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1951No. S. F. 18232PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against it in plaintiff’s action, brought under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C.A. § 688)1, to recover for injuries suffered by him while employed as the operator of defendant’s tugboat, the “Moore No. 2.” We conclude that by reason of the misconduct of counsel in moving in the presence of the jury, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, to amend the complaint by increasing the amount prayed for as damages, which motion was subsequently granted by the trial court, and the fact *814thereof brought to the attention of the jury, the judgment must be reversed.

The…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Norton v. Warner Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Beagle v. VasoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. FriendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API