Legal Opinion

Concepcion v. Morton

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 7, 2002No. 01-4345PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), 110 Stat. 1321-73, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), provides that a prisoner confined in any jail, prison or correctional facility may not bring any action under any federal law — with respect to prison conditions — “until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” The issue in this case is whether the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement applies to a grievance procedure de scribed in an inmate handbook but not formally adopted by a state administrative agency. We hold that it does.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. James Barber v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Williams v. HaymanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  4. Concepcion v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. Lee v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API