Concepcion v. Morton
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), 110 Stat. 1321-73, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), provides that a prisoner confined in any jail, prison or correctional facility may not bring any action under any federal law — with respect to prison conditions — “until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” The issue in this case is whether the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement applies to a grievance procedure de scribed in an inmate handbook but not formally adopted by a state administrative agency. We hold that it does.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- James Barber v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Williams v. HaymanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Concepcion v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Lee v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.