Legal Opinion
Lee v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 30, 2006No. Civ.A. 04-1013PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLOCH, District Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment (document No. 44) in this action. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is granted in part and denied in part, and, accordingly, Counts II, III, IV, VII, and XII *278of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
I.Background
Plaintiffs claims in this case essentially fall under two categories. Part I of the First Amended Complaint (“Amended Complaint” or “Am. Compl.”) sets forth 8 counts in which Plaintiff alleges that Defendant violated the Freedom of Information Act, 5…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jean-Pierre v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Kenney v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Powell v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bartko v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Kenney v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.