Legal Opinion
Austin v. Dionne
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 7, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-359PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Joseph Austin (“Austin”) is a New Jersey resident employed by Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., (“PNI”) in Pennsylvania. He was injured in an automobile accident in Pennsylvania while on personal business. As a result of the accident, Austin sought lost wages through his automobile insurance policy and through supplemental payments for wage benefits under his PNI disability insurance policy.
Defendant Charles Dionne (“Dionne”) has filed a motion in limine seeking to preclude plaintiffs from introducing at trial evidence of lost wages which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Holmes ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Broederdorf v. BachelerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Permenter v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Tannenbaum v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Danowski by Danowski v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.