Legal Opinion

Hill v. Sutton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Jennings Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.

—This suit was brought by the appellant against the appellees, to procure an execution under section 642, 2 G. & H. 297, and this is the complaint :

“ James Hill, assignee of Thomas Wilkerson, complains of each of the defendants, and says that heretofore, to wit, *593on the 13th day of March, at the March term of the Jennings Circuit Court, in the State of Indiana, in the year i86r,. said Thomas Wilkerson recovered a judgment in said court against Benjamin R. Suttonforthesum oftwo thousand dollars,, with costs of suit; that by agreement of said Wilkerson and said Benj. R. Sutton (entered on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cummins v. WaldenIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Larrimore v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Brownlee v. KenneippIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Bell v. TanguyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Pauley v. ShortIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. State ex rel. StottlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Keesling v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Pauley v. LangdonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hockett v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API