Legal Opinion

Keesling v. Watson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1883No. 10,380PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

— The appellee brought this action against the appellant. The complaint consisted of four paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer, for the want of facts, was overruled. A motion to strike out portions of the second paragraph was also overruled. An answer was filed, a trial had, a verdict returned, and over a motion for a new trial judgment was rendered for the appellee.

These rulings have been assigned as error.

The first three paragraphs of the complaint seem to be founded upon the same note. The first, after averring that the plaintiff was the duly appointed administrator of Coracy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Railsback v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Halstead v. Board of Comm'rsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Durland v. PitcairnIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. House v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Leach v. RhodesIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Walker v. LarkinIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. IronsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Shaughnessey v. JordanIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Lewis v. GodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. City of Huntington v. CastIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API