Hockett v. Johnson
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Grant Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Black, C.
The overruling of a motion for a new trial is the only supposed error assigned. The causes stated in the motion for a new trial were, that the finding was not sustained by the evidence; that it was contrary to the evidence; that it was contrary to law; and that the damages were excessive.
There is a bill of exceptions containing evidence which is said in the bill to have been all the evidence given in the •cause; but it affirmatively appears that this statement is not correct, for it is'recited in the bill that a certain record was introduced in evidence, but it is not contained in…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bowen v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Hinkle v. MargerumIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Morrow v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Ward v. BatemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Millikan v. State ex rel. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.