Legal Opinion

Hockett v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9875Published

Erom the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

The overruling of a motion for a new trial is the only supposed error assigned. The causes stated in the motion for a new trial were, that the finding was not sustained by the evidence; that it was contrary to the evidence; that it was contrary to law; and that the damages were excessive.

There is a bill of exceptions containing evidence which is said in the bill to have been all the evidence given in the •cause; but it affirmatively appears that this statement is not correct, for it is'recited in the bill that a certain record was introduced in evidence, but it is not contained in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bowen v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Hinkle v. MargerumIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Morrow v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Ward v. BatemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Millikan v. State ex rel. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API