Legal Opinion

State v. May

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 24, 1970No. 7018SC323PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

Defendant assigns as error the court’s action in changing the suspended sentences and imposing active sentences upon learning of defendant’s intention to appeal.

“In criminal cases the right of appeal by a convicted defendant from a final judgment is unlimited in the courts of North Carolina. This right of appeal is a substantial right. G.S. 15-180; S. v. Hodge, 267 N.C. 238, 147 S.E. 2d 881; S. v. Darnell, 266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E. 2d 800; S. v. Grundler, 251 N.C. 177, 111 S.E. 2d 1; S. v. Blades, 209 N.C. 56, 182 S.E. 714. In S. v. Calcutt, 219 N.C. 545, 15 S.E. 2d 9, we held that the execution…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State v. . CalcuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. State v. RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LowryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. In Re MosesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Moffitt v. BlackledgeDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. MusselwhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API