Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1949PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

Tbe court charged tbe jury as follows : “One is permitted to fight in self-defense or kill in self-defense when it is necessary for him to do so in order to avoid death or great bodily harm.” This instruction was not qualified elsewhere in the charge, and constitutes one of the defendant’s assignments of error.

Manifestly, the instruction denied to the accused the right “to fight in self-defense or kill in self-defense” in the absence of an actual necessity for so doing even though he may have honestly and reasonably believed from the circumstances surrounding him at the time that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  2. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. Barrett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. State v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. MulvihillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Billy Honeycutt v. Mr. William B. Mahoney, Superintendent Attorney General of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. State v. ClaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API