Legal Opinion

Grosshuesch v. Cramer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 15, 2005No. 26086PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

Bernard and Eleanor Breedlove (the Breedloves) appeal the trial court’s decision denying their request for a preliminary injunction. This case was certified from the court of appeals pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We reverse.

Factual /Procedural Background

The Breedloves are elderly individuals with substantial assets. In the mid to late 1990’s, the Breedloves became acquainted with Lisa Cramer, an employee in the Personal Trust division of one of the Breedloves’ banking institutions. Over time, Lisa Cramer became an individual in whom Eleanor Breedlove placed a considerable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doe v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. County of Richland v. SimpkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Scratch Golf Co. v. Dunes West Residential Golf Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Wiedemann v. Town of Hilton Head IslandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Denman v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Grosshuesch v. CramerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Rhett v. GrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Byrd v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Park Regency, LLC v. R & D Development of the CarolinasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API