Legal Opinion

Grosshuesch v. Cramer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 2008No. 26453PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

These consolidated appeals relate to several discovery orders in a civil action. Bernard and Eleanor Breedlove initiated the underlying lawsuit seeking to set aside several transfers of assets to Lisa and Nathan Cramer on the grounds of fraud and undue influence. The parties contest several issues on appeal, but the foremost is whether the trial court erred in imposing discovery-related sanctions on Lisa Cramer. The Cramers argue that the trial court should not have imposed sanctions, and the Breedloves argue that the trial court should have imposed more. Additionally, the Cramers’ attorneys…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Raffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. TiffanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Hodge v. Unihealth Post-Acute Care of Bamberg, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  3. Metts v. MimsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. In Re the Care & Treatment of CanuppCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Spartanburg Buddhist Center v. OrkCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API