Mumford v. Sewall
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Multnomah County.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Waldo, J.:
The act of October 26, 1882, entitled “An act to define *68tbe terms ‘land.’ and ‘real property’ for tbe purpose of taxation and to provide where the same shall be assessed and taxed, and to declare what instruments whereby land or real property is made security for the payment of a debt shall be void, and to repeal sections 2 and 7 of chap. 50 of the miscellaneous laws of Oregon,” provided that a mortgage of real property should, for the purposes of taxation, be deemed to be real property, and should be assessed and taxed to the owner thereof in the county where recorded.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- North Missouri Railroad v. MaguireSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- People Ex Rel. Purdy v. Commissioners of Highways of the Town of MarlboroughNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- City of Davenport v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Northern Counties Trust v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Boyd v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Common Council v. Board of AssessorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.