Lasiter v. Ferguson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error fronj District Court, Seminole County; J. W. Bolen, Judge. Action by Fred Lasiter, administrator of the estate of Cotcha Holatka, deceased, against Walter Ferguson to recover land and quiet title. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action commenced by Cotcha Holatka as plaintiff against the deft ndant in error, Walter Ferguson, and others claiming under him, for the purpose of recovering a certain tract of land and for quieting title thereto. Pending the action Cotcha Holatka died and the cause was revived in the name of his administrator, Fred Lasiter, the plaintiff in error herein. The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts which discloses that the land involved was the allotment of Okfuskey, a full-blood Indian and a nu ruber and citizen of the Seminole Tribe or Nation, who died intestate on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Campbell v. WadsworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Bruner v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Cochran v. BlanckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Heliker-Jarvis Seminole Co. v. LincolnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by11 opinions
- Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I. O. O. F.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Harjo v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Snell v. CanardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Lincoln v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Farmers Nat. Bank v. De FeverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.