Heliker-Jarvis Seminole Co. v. Lincoln
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Seminole County; Robt. M. Rainey Judge. Action by the Heliker-Jarvis Seminole Company against .Peter Lincoln and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
On March 3, 1909, the Heliker-Jarvis Seminole Company, a corporation, plaintiff in error, sued Peter Lincoln, Nancy Bruner, Plenty Fay, Alex Fay, John Fay, Albert Carolina, and Peter Carolina in the district court of Seminole county for the partition of 160 acres of land in said county, the allotment of Washington Lincoln, alleging itself to be the owner in fee of an undivided twenty-three forty-fifths thereof by virtue of a transfer to it of the title of defendants Albert Carolina, John Fay, and other alleged heirs at law of said Washington Lincoln, deceased, all duly enrolled citizens of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bruner v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harjo v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Thorn v. ConeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Palmer v. CullySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Cook v. ChildsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Lasiter v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.