Legal Opinion

State v. Anyanwu

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 2004No. A03-1418PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellant Richard Anyanwu challenges his conviction based on a plea agreement that was negotiated with the court, arguing that the district court impermissibly became a direct participant in the plea negotiations. Because the district court erred by improperly injecting itself into the plea agreement negotiations and promising a particular sentence in advance, we reverse arid reriiand.

FACTS

Appellant Richard Anyanwu allegedly shot H.I. while she was seated in her car, in her garage. The state charged Anyan-wu with attempted first-degree murder, and first- and second-degree…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Alanis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Ballweber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  5. Melde v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API