State v. Anyanwu
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
Appellant Richard Anyanwu challenges his conviction based on a plea agreement that was negotiated with the court, arguing that the district court impermissibly became a direct participant in the plea negotiations. Because the district court erred by improperly injecting itself into the plea agreement negotiations and promising a particular sentence in advance, we reverse arid reriiand.
FACTS
Appellant Richard Anyanwu allegedly shot H.I. while she was seated in her car, in her garage. The state charged Anyan-wu with attempted first-degree murder, and first- and second-degree…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Alanis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Ballweber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Melde v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.