State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHUTICH, Judge.
The State of Minnesota challenges the district court’s decision to sua sponte vacate respondent Stacie Ann Miller’s guilty plea to third-degree driving while impaired and to order the return of an administrative-costs fee, contending that no legal basis exists to support those actions. Because the district court erred in vacating Miller’s plea without providing the parties with notice and an opportunity to be heard, and because the district court incorrectly applied the law-of-the-case doctrine, we reverse.
FACTS
According to the complaint, on December 26, 2012, at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. LemmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marriage of Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Robert James TolbertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Scotty William PolchowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016