Legal Opinion

Tarsia v. Nick's Laundry & Linen Supply Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1965Published

1Opinion of the Court

239 Or. 562 (1965)

399 P.2d 28

TARSIA

v.

NICK'S LAUNDRY & LINEN SUPPLY CO. ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued October 7, 1964.

Reversed February 10, 1965.

James J. Damis, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Damis & Damis, Portland.

Leo S. Meysing, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Brune, Meysing & Meredith, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL and DENECKE, Justices.

REVERSED.

PERRY, J.

The plaintiff brought this action under the provisions of ORS 59.250 to recover from the defendants the sum of $700, paid by plaintiff to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Gales v. WeldonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Tarsia v. Nick's Laundry & Linen Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Koeneke v. B & O Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API