Tarsia v. Nick's Laundry & Linen Supply Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
The plaintiff brought this action under the provisions of ORS 59.250 to recover from the defendants the sum of $700, paid by plaintiff to defendants for the purchase of shares of stock in the defendant corporation.
The plaintiff prevailed in the trial court and the defendants appeal.
There is very little dispute on the facts. All of the issued stock of the corporation at its inception was held by the defendant Nick Rossos and his wife, and Joe Cancilla and his wife. It is admitted that the stock of the defendant corporation had not been registered with the corporation commissioner for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Koeneke v. B & O Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Orville Baker, Roy Wireman, Skid Ronnie Manns, and Ellis MannsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- State v. SheetsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lewelling v. First California Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. CollierDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973
- State v. AmsdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.