Legal Opinion

Koeneke v. B & O Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

Duane Koeneke and wife Vivian brought an action to recover from the defendants a sum paid defendants in the purchase of shares of stock in the B & 0 Lumber Company, an Oregon corporation.

A. F. Hurt and wife Velma also brought an action for the same purpose and the two cases were consolidated for trial and this appeal.

The plaintiffs recovered judgment and the defendants appeal.

The facts disclose and the trial court found that the stock of the lumber company had not been registered with the Corporation Commissioner for the purpose of sale and no permit or license for the sale had been granted.

Th…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Lovett v. GillOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Napier v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tarsia v. Nick's Laundry & Linen Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Marshall v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Freightliner Corporation v. GylesOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Marshall v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Tarsia v. Nick's Laundry & Linen Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API