Legal Opinion

Emerson C. Custis & Co. v. Tradesmans National Bank & Trust Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1944No. Appeal, 224PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This action in assumpsit was tried before a judge of the municipal court without a jury. See section 12 of the Act of July 12, 1913, P. L. 711, as amended by the Act of June 20, 1919, P. L. 515, §1, 17 PS §695. The trial-judge made a general finding for defendant. The court in banc refused plaintiff’s motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial; Plaintiff has appealed from the. judgment entered on the finding.

Appellant brought this action against defendant to recover the sum of $1,675 upon a quantum meruit for compensation for services alleged to have been rendered in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jann v. Linton's LunchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Philadelphia & Gulf Steamship Co. v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Deacon v. HendricksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Robinson Electrical Co. v. Capitol Trucking Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Dauer v. PichowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Schwenn v. S. Goldberg & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  5. Clemens v. Granda, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API