State v. Bosworth
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.
This is a usury matter. The respondent was prosecuted and convicted under 9 V.S.A. §34 (c). The information filed by the state’s attorney charged that the respondent on the 9th day of September, 1961 “did then and there knowingly and wilfully contract with and aid and assist one Samuel Emilo to contract with Earl E. Farnsworth and Marguerite Farnsworth for a sum of money in excess of the legal interest for the loan, use, or forebearance of money, without express authorization of law, in that the said Wayne C. Bosworth and Samuel Emilo did loan said Earl E. Farnsworth and Marguerite…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. OrlandiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- State v. LevineSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
- Putnam v. WoodardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- Federal Land Bank of Springfield v. GoyetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BarrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. BallouSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
- Brown v. PiliniSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Farnsworth v. CochranSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.