Legal Opinion

State v. Levine

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 1952No. 1801, 1802PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCleary, J.

This respondent was charged in separate informations as accessory before the fact of burglary and as accessory before the fact of grand larceny. He pleaded not guilty and the two cases were tried together. Trial was by jury with a verdict and judgment of guilty in both cases and they are here on the respondent’s exceptions.

The exceptions to the denial of the respondent’s motions for a directed verdict, to the court’s charge to the jury and to the denial of the respondent’s motion in arrest of judgment are all briefed on the same ground, namely, that the respondent could not be found guilty of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Branch v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. . BlivenNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Duchaine, B.N.F. v. RaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  5. Ackerman v. KogutSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. GoyetSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  2. State v. BishopSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  3. State v. GarceauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  4. State v. TrumanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  5. Lewis v. GagneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API