Legal Opinion

Utz v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1942No. S. F. 16715PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

— By writ of certiorari, the petitioner has challenged the recommendation of The State Bar that she be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years. Although a local administrative committee found that she should be disbarred because (1) she forged the signatures of the sureties on two bonds filed in estates being probated by her; (2) she altered and then filed "with the probate court a receipt of a distributive share from an estate after signature by the distributee; and (3) she improperly solicited professional employment and split professional fees with unli…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smallberg v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Howe v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Paine v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Irving v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Werner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McIntosh v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Emmons, Williams, Mires & Leech v. State BarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Medoff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API