Utz v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
— By writ of certiorari, the petitioner has challenged the recommendation of The State Bar that she be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years. Although a local administrative committee found that she should be disbarred because (1) she forged the signatures of the sureties on two bonds filed in estates being probated by her; (2) she altered and then filed "with the probate court a receipt of a distributive share from an estate after signature by the distributee; and (3) she improperly solicited professional employment and split professional fees with unli…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smallberg v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Howe v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Paine v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Irving v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Werner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McIntosh v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Emmons, Williams, Mires & Leech v. State BarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Medoff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.