Legal Opinion

Irving v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 12673PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review an order of the Board of Governors of The State Bar of California recommending that the petitioner be suspended from the practice of law in this state for a period of one year.

The evidence upon which the sentence of suspension was based is similar to that in Howe v. State Bar, 212 Cal. 222 [298 Pac. 25], decided April 1st of this year, in which the recommendation that Howe be' suspended for a period of two years was followed by this court. Both Howe and petitioner were connected with the West Coast Claims Bureau, under which fictitious name one M. B.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herron v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Smallberg v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Howe v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Shaw v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gendron v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Woodard v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Utz v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Dahl v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Dudney v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API