Paine v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
On a reconsideration of this matter, we cannot conclude that the petitioner should be absolved from all discipline, as is so earnestly sought on petition for rehearing. On the record presented the petitioner should be subjected to some substantial discipline. We are persuaded, however, that the ends of justice will be subserved by the reduction of the period of suspension from two years to six months. Accordingly, the following portion of the opinion heretofore rendered is adopted and the period of suspension reduced as indicated:
“This is a petition to review a recommendation of the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Bernstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Gum v. DudleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Garlow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.