Hale v. Belgrade Co., Ltd.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
The complaint herein is in the usual form in an action to quiet title in plaintiffs to certain real estate described; it is therein alleged that each of the defendants claims some interest in the property adverse to plaintiffs, but that such claims are “without right.” . The plaintiffs were, at the time of the commencement of the action, minors, and therefore appeared by guardian ad litem.
The Belgrade Company, Limited, demurred to the complaint, but, on the demurrer being overruled, failed to plead further, and its default was duly entered. The Farmers’ Bank of Belgrade, by affirmative…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
- Murphy v. NettMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- Wilson v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. La France Copper Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Montana National Bank v. MichelsMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Russell v. Sunburst Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
- Dubie v. BataniMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Whitcomb v. BeyerleinMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Story Gold Dredging Co. v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.