Legal Opinion

Russell v. Sunburst Refining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1928No. 6,261PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

After the original opinion in this case was handed down a petition for rehearing was granted. Our conclusion in the first place was based upon a single contention raised by counsel for defendant, and on re-argument we were led to doubt the correctness of the basis of the decision. For this reason the original opinion is ordered withdrawn and this one substituted for it.

The plaintiff in this action, doing business under the name of Auto Gas & Oil Company, seeks to recover from defendant, a Montana corporation, moneys which he alleges he paid to it as a result of deceits practiced upon him.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bank of the United States v. DANIELSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. People v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pincus v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State v. EspelinMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. JAMES A. HEAD & COMPANY v. RollingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Hurly v. Star Transfer CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  5. McGonigle v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API