Legal Opinion

Neeley v. Union Potash & Chemical Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1943No. 4701PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There is involved in this case, primarily, the question of whether appellees, as employer and insurer respectively, have become liable because of a violation of the safety appliance statute hereinafter set out, a part of the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Appellant Neeley, as the surviving widow, sued to recover for the death of her husband, Marcus Neeley, who received injuries through accident in the course of his employment as a workman employed by appellee Union Potash and Chemical Company, appellee London Guarantee and Accident Company, Ltd., being the insurer. The said parties will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Utah Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Mead Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Perez v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Luebbers ex rel. SalazarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Bowles v. AmmonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API