Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Luebbers ex rel. Salazar
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 2005No. 23,556PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Chief Judge.
{1} Naomi Luebbers (Luebbers) presented a claim to State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (State Farm) on behalf of her minor son, Brian Salazar, Jr. for uninsured motorist benefits, alleging that Brian Jr. sustained loss of consortium damages as a result of the shooting death of his Father by or with the complicity of the operator of an uninsured motor vehicle. State Farm sought a declaratory judgment that its insurance policies did not provide coverage for Luebbers’ claims. In a motion for summary judgment, State Farm argued (1) Brian Jr. did not qualify as an…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- John Crumpton, IV v. Daryl Gates Tom Bradley Tom Reddin Ed Davis Herbert Boeckmann Maxwell E. Greenberg Barbara L. Schlei Robert TalcottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Ueland v. Pengo Hydra-Pull Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Theama v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Boradiansky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Castillo v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Arias v. Phoenix Indemnity InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Spencer v. Paul Barber, Barber & Borg, L.L.C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Thompson v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.