Legal Opinion
State v. Pleas
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 28, 1983No. CX-81-839PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Defendant was charged in district court with aggravated forgery-uttering, Minn. Stat. § 609.625, subd. 1(1), (3) (1982). The omnibus court suppressed a statement defendant made to police at the scene of his arrest on the ground that the statement was obtained in violation of the Miranda rule, but the court denied a defense motion to suppress evidence on fourth amendment grounds. Thereafter, defendant waived his right to trial by jury and allowed the trial court to try him on the basis of a stipulation concerning the state’s evidence against him. 1 The trial court found…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. EverettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. SchinzingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.