Mayor of Montezuma v. Brown
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) We are of the opinion that the act of 1925 authorized the collection of the assessments specified in the executions. The purpose of that act, as stated in the caption, is as follows: “to authorize counties of Georgia to co-operate with municipalities in the paving and improvement of streets in such municipalities, to authorize the use of *6county funds for the paving and improvement of streets of municipalities, to authorize the paving and improving of streets by counties and municipalities jointly by contract or otherwise, to authorize municipalities in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Holt v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Montgomery v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- City of Bainbridge v. JesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Raines v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Mayor of Washington v. FaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Bass v. Mayor of MilledgevilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Georgia Power Co. v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Wall v. Mayor C. of MilledgevilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.